Certificate of Lawfulness approved for a single-storey rear extension to a detached dwelling on the Metropolitan Green Belt in Hertfordshire.

​

Following an initial planning appraisal with the applicants En-Plan drafted a Certificate of Lawfulness Application  that was subsequently submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. The Certificate of Lawfulness route was considered the best option as the previous plannig history of the prierty coupe, dwith its positon in the Metropolitan Green Belt meant any formal planning application for an extension would be refused.

​

The plannig history for the site is as follows:

​

• Rear Extension of 3.5 Metres.

  Ref. No: 20/00009/LDP | Status: Granted

• Single storey rear extension

  Ref. No: 4/00233/06/FHA | Status: Refused

• Proposed side and rear extension

  Ref. No: 4/00968/97/FHA | Status: Granted

• First floor side extension

  Ref. No: 4/00238/95/FHA | Status: Granted

 

The council have previously refused two planing applications for similar proposal before En-Plan were asked to get involved and with our knowledge of the General Permitted Development Order and the ways in which householders can extend their property without the need for full planning permission we were successful in delivering approval under a Certificate of Lawfulness for a bespoke kitchen extension which the applicants are extremely please with considering the previous refusal on the property that have hindered the extension of the existing kitchen.

​

The approved scheme will allow for a new bespoke kitchen extension thta te onwers were after so gthey could develpo the property prior to selling

​

What is the future of the London Green Belt?

​

The future of the London Green Belt will depend on various factors, including government policies, population growth, housing needs, and environmental considerations. Here are a few potential scenarios:

​

1. Preservation and enhancement: There may be continued efforts to protect and enhance the Green Belt. Policies and regulations could be strengthened to prevent encroachment, promote conservation, and ensure the sustainable use of land within the Green Belt. This approach would prioritize the preservation of green spaces, biodiversity, and the rural character of the area.

2. Development and urban expansion: In response to the increasing demand for housing and infrastructure, there might be pressures to encroach upon the Green Belt for development purposes. If policymakers prioritize urban expansion, there could be debates about modifying or reducing the Green Belt boundaries to accommodate growth. However, such decisions would likely be met with opposition from environmentalists, conservationists, and local communities concerned about the loss of green spaces.

3. Balanced approach: A middle ground could be sought, aiming to balance the need for development with the preservation of the Green Belt. This approach might involve focusing development within existing urban areas, promoting brownfield redevelopment, and prioritizing sustainable construction practices. Efforts could be made to improve connectivity and transportation links, reducing the need for sprawling development into the Green Belt.

 

It's worth noting that any changes to the Green Belt would require careful planning, stakeholder engagement, and consideration of long-term implications. The future direction will depend on the priorities and decisions of policymakers, public opinion, and the wider societal and environmental context.

​

Further Information

​

If you would like to find out more about how our Planning Consultancy, Architectural Design Services, and Building Regulations know how can work in perfect sync to achieve a successful outcome in the planning system please contact us and we will be only too happy to talk through any questions or development proposals you may have.

​

READ MORE NEWS

​